The Canadian Medical Association Journal denounced the federal government for its continued efforts to block international controls on asbestos at the UN-sponsored Rotterdam Convention in 2008.
A strongly worded editorial said the government “knows what it is doing is shameful and wrong” and compared Ottawa’s moral stature in continuing to promote the use of the cancer-causing material to that of arms traders.
The negotiations, known as the Rotterdam Convention, started October 27, 2008 in Rome. One item on the agenda was to decide whether to add the chrysotile variety of asbestos to the world’s list of most dangerous substances. When a substance is listed, countries must give prior informed consent that they know they are buying a highly dangerous material before being allowed to accept any imports.
At the 2006 convention, Canada successfully led a group of countries including Iran, Zimbabwe and Kyrgyzstan in stopping the action. Canada was the only advanced Western country to take such a position. Unfortunately, the events of 2006 repeated themselves in 2008.
Quebec is a major asbestos miner, and the industry provides about 700 jobs in the province. Because of litigation risk and health concerns, Canada no longer uses much asbestos so most of the asbestos mined is exported, mainly to developing countries, where it is added to cement building materials. Ottawa has spent about $20-million since the mid-1980s to promote asbestos use. It has contended that the chrysotile type mined in Quebec is less harmful than other varieties and that with proper safeguards, cancer risk can be minimized.
Asbestos dust causes lung cancer; mesothelioma, a painful and deadly malignancy in the lining of the chest wall; and asbestosis, a serious, chronic respiratory disease. The World Health Organization says all types of asbestos cause cancer and estimates the mineral leads to 100,000 preventable deaths annually around the world.
Chrysotile is the only type of asbestos remaining on the world market. The other forms have already been listed under the United Nations convention. The editorial marks the first time the medical association journal has spoken out against the federal government’s asbestos position.
Health Canada has convened a panel to study health effects of asbestos and a study was completed in March 2008.
The editorial says Canada’s view that its asbestos is a less potent carcinogen is scientifically dubious and is “redolent of the tobacco industry’s playbook on light cigarettes.”
David Boyd, an adjunct professor at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, B.C., and one of the editorial’s authors, said a consensus has emerged among public-health officials that asbestos needs to be eliminated and that the government’s actions are damaging Canada’s international reputation. “Canada really sticks out like a sore thumb when it comes to not only exporting it, but promoting it as well.”
